views:

956

answers:

3

I am using Python with psycopg2 and I'm trying to run a full VACUUM after a daily operation which inserts several thousand rows. The problem is that when I try to run the VACUUM command within my code I get the following error:

psycopg2.InternalError: VACUUM cannot run inside a transaction block

How do I run this from the code outside a transaction block?

If it makes a difference, I have a simple DB abstraction class, a subset of which is displayed below for context (not runnable, exception-handling and docstrings omitted and line spanning adjustments made):

class db(object):
    def __init__(dbname, host, port, user, password):
        self.conn = psycopg2.connect("dbname=%s host=%s port=%s \
                                      user=%s password=%s" \
                                      % (dbname, host, port, user, password))

        self.cursor = self.conn.cursor()

    def _doQuery(self, query):
        self.cursor.execute(query)
        self.conn.commit()

    def vacuum(self):
        query = "VACUUM FULL"
        self._doQuery(query)
A: 

I don't know psycopg2 and PostgreSQL, but only apsw and SQLite, so I think I can not give a "psycopg2" help.

But it seams to me, that PostgreSQL might work similar as SQLite does, it has two modes of operation:

  • Outside a transaction block: This is semantically equivalent to have a transaction block around every single SQL operation
  • Inside a transaction block, that is marked by "BEGIN TRANSACTION" and ended by "END TRANSACTION"

When this is the case, the problem could be inside the access layer psycopg2. When it does normally operate in a way that transactions are implicitely inserted until a commit is made, there could be no "standard way" to make a vacuum.

Of course it could be possible, that "psycopg2" has its special "vacuum" method, or a special operation mode, where no implicit transactions are started.

When no such possibilities exists, there stays one single option (without changing the access layer ;-) ):

Most databases have a shell programm to access the database. The program could run this shell program with a pipe (entering the vacuum-command into the shell), thus using the shell programm to make the vacuum. Since vacuum is a slow operation as such, the start of an external programm will be neglectible. Of course, the actual program should commit all uncommited work before, else there could be a dead-lock situation - the vacuum must wait until end of your last transaction.

Juergen
Thanks for your detailed answer. It turns out the solution was to do with "isolation levels", see my answer below.
Wayne Koorts
+6  A: 

After more searching I have discovered the isolation_level property of the psycopg2 connection object. It turns out that changing this to 0 will move you out of a transaction block. Changing the vacuum method of the above class to the following solves it. Note that I also set the isolation level back to what it previously was just in case (seems to be 1 by default).

def vacuum(self):
    old_isolation_level = self.conn.isolation_level
    self.conn.set_isolation_level(0)
    query = "VACUUM FULL"
    self._doQuery(query)
    self.conn.set_isolation_level(old_isolation_level)

This article (near the end on that page) provides a brief explanation of isolation levels in this context.

Wayne Koorts
A: 

Don't do it - you don't need VACUUM FULL. Actually if you run somewhat recent version of Postgres (let's say > 8.1) you don't even need to run plain VACUUM manually.

Milen A. Radev
Depending on your usage patterns, there are still times it makes sense to vacuum manually imho.
rfusca
There are, but there aren't as many anymore. And it should definitely not be VACUUM FULL.
Magnus Hagander