BindingList<T>.Sort() to behave like a List<T>.Sort()

Question

I am attempting to write a SortableBindingList that I can use for my application. I have found lots of discussion about how to implement basic sorting support so that the BindingList will sort when used in the context of a DataGridView or some other bound control including this post from StackOverflow:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/249779/datagridview-sort-and-e-g-bindinglistt-in-net

This is all very helpful and I have implemented the code, tested, etc. and it's all working, but in my particular situation, I need to be able to support a simple call to Sort() and have that call use the default IComparable.CompareTo() to do the sorting, rather than making a call to ApplySortCore(PropertyDescriptor, ListSortDirection).

The reason is because I have quite a great deal of code that's depending on the Sort() call because this particular class originally inherited from List and was recently changed to be a BindingList.

So specifically, I have a class called VariableCode and a collection class called VariableCodeList. VariableCode implements IComparable and the logic in there is moderately complex based on several properties, etc...

public class VariableCode : ...  IComparable ...
{
    public int CompareTo(object p_Target)
    {
        int output = 0;
        //some interesting stuff here
        return output;
    }
}

public class VariableCodeList : SortableBindingList<VariableCode>
{
    public void Sort()
    {
        //This is where I need help
        //  How do I sort this list using the IComparable
        //  logic from the class above?
    }
}

I've made a few failed attempts at repurposing the ApplySortCore method in the Sort(), but what keeps thwarting me is that the ApplySortCore expects a PropertyDescriptor to do its sort and I can't figure out how to get that to use the IComparable.CompareTo() logic.

Can someone point me in the right direction?

Many thanks.

---

EDIT: This is the final code based on Marc's response for future reference.

  /// <summary>
  /// Sorts using the default IComparer of T
  /// </summary>
  public void Sort()
  {
     sort(null, null);
  }
  public void Sort(IComparer<T> p_Comparer)
  {
     sort(p_Comparer, null);
  }
  public void Sort(Comparison<T> p_Comparison)
  {
     sort(null, p_Comparison);
  }
  private void sort(IComparer<T> p_Comparer, Comparison<T> p_Comparison)
  {

     m_SortProperty = null;
     m_SortDirection = ListSortDirection.Ascending;

     //Extract items and sort separately
     List<T> sortList = new List<T>();
     this.ForEach(item => sortList.Add(item));//Extension method for this call
     if (p_Comparison == null)
     {
        sortList.Sort(p_Comparer);
     }//if
     else
     {
        sortList.Sort(p_Comparison);
     }//else

     //Disable notifications, rebuild, and re-enable notifications
     bool oldRaise = RaiseListChangedEvents;
     RaiseListChangedEvents = false;
     try
     {
        ClearItems();
        sortList.ForEach(item => this.Add(item));
     }
     finally
     {
        RaiseListChangedEvents = oldRaise;
        ResetBindings();
     }

  }

Answer 1

Emulating a property just to do the sort is probably overkill. The first thing to look at is Comparer<T>.Default. It might, however, turn out that the easiest thing to do is to:

• extract the data into List<T> or similar
• sort the extracted data
• disable notifications
• reload the data
• re-enable notifications
• send a "reset" message

btw, you should be disabling notifications during your existing sort, too.

public void Sort() {
    // TODO: clear your "sort" variables (prop/order)

    T[] arr = new T[Count];
    CopyTo(arr, 0);
    Array.Sort(arr);
    bool oldRaise = RaiseListChangedEvents;
    RaiseListChangedEvents = false; // <=== oops, added!
    try {
        ClearItems();
        foreach (T item in arr) {
            Add(item);
        }
    } finally {
        RaiseListChangedEvents = oldRaise;
        ResetBindings();
    }    
}