Hello!
We have a problem with our production environment which uses a modified version of jBPM that has support for priorities. Indices present are:
| JBPM_TIMER | 1 | JBPM_TIMER_DUEDATE__PRIORITY_ | 1 | PRIORITY_ | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | |
| JBPM_TIMER | 1 | JBPM_TIMER_DUEDATE__PRIORITY_ | 2 | DUEDATE_ | A | 51 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | |
The problematic query:
mysql> explain select * from JBPM_TIMER where PRIORITY_ < 0 order by PRIORITY_ ASC, DUEDATE_ desc;
+----+-------------+------------+-------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+---------+------+------+-----------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+------------+-------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+---------+------+------+-----------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | JBPM_TIMER | range | JBPM_TIMER_DUEDATE__PRIORITY_ | JBPM_TIMER_DUEDATE__PRIORITY_ | 5 | NULL | 10 | Using where; Using filesort |
+----+-------------+------------+-------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+---------+------+------+-----------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
The query with PRIORITY_ sorted ascending instead:
mysql> explain select * from JBPM_TIMER where PRIORITY_ < 0 order by PRIORITY_ ASC, DUEDATE_ asc;
+----+-------------+------------+-------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+---------+------+------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+------------+-------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+---------+------+------+-------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | JBPM_TIMER | range | JBPM_TIMER_DUEDATE__PRIORITY_ | JBPM_TIMER_DUEDATE__PRIORITY_ | 5 | NULL | 10 | Using where |
+----+-------------+------------+-------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+---------+------+------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
Googling around suggests that the solution to this is to add another column (REVERSEPRIORITY_) that contains the value of PRIORITY_ * -1 and index that one instead. This seems to me like a pretty ugly solution so I want to ask you folks if you have better ones!