Hi, as a fact of performance which one is better? Is there a difference between the actual 3 three versions of sql-server (2000 / 2005 / 2008)?
views:
80answers:
2
A:
If you're going to see performance differences, they'll be minute.
I believe the preferred style is
ISNULL(email, '') = ''
Justin Niessner
2009-11-16 22:00:53
Performance differences can be very dramatic actually - the optimizer is not very predictable at optimizing filters wrapped with functions. See a simple test below for verification. SARGability is a term sometimes used here, though it's not exactly the same.
chadhoc
2009-11-16 22:24:07
+3
A:
You definitely want to avoid the use of any custom or built-in functions wrapping a column in a filter - it severely limits what the optimizer can do for you in terms of index usage and seekability. You should get in the habit of using equality operators and or/union approaches when possible, as is the case here. The following would be much preferred over a isnull() or coalesce() approach:
where (
(t.email is null)
or
(t.email = '')
)
or a union approach as outlined below could work better as well, try it out in your environment to determine which option is best.
A simple example will demonstrate the drastic differences you can see in performance:
use tempdb;
go
if object_id('tempdb..#testTable') > 0
drop table #testTable;
go
-- Build the dataset
select top 10000000
cast(cast(a.name as varchar(100)) + '@' + cast(row_number() over (order by a.object_id) as varchar(15)) + '.com' as varchar(150)) as email,
row_number() over (order by a.object_id) as id
into #testTable
from sys.columns a
cross join sys.columns b
cross join sys.columns c
go
-- Create some nulls
update #testTable
set email = null
where id % 1000 = 0
go
-- Index
create unique clustered index ixc__dbo_testTable__temp__nc1 on #testTable (email,id) on [default];
go
set statistics io on;
set statistics time on;
go
-- Try with isnull - ~cost of about 44.7 on my machine, ~2900ms to execute, and about 49,200 logical reads
select *
from #testTable t
where isnull(t.email,'') = '';
go
-- Try with 'or' - ~cost of about .049 on my machine, ~643ms to execute, about 31 logical reads
select *
from #testTable t
where (
(t.email is null)
or
(t.email = '')
);
go
-- Try with union approach - ~cost of about .054 on my machine, ~751ms to execute, ~30 logical reads
select *
from #testTable t
where t.email is null
union all
select *
from #testTable t
where t.email = '';
go
if object_id('tempdb..#testTable') > 0
drop table #testTable;
go
chadhoc
2009-11-16 22:22:29