I wrote some extensions methods to handle the css class like how you would do it in jQuery. Since I'm using ASP.NET the framework has two extension points i need to handle.
The first one is System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebControl
public static bool HasCssClass(this WebControl control, string className)
public static void AddCssClass(this WebControl control, string className)
public static void RemoveCssClass(this WebControl control, string className)
and the second one is System.Web.UI.IAttributeAccessor
public static bool HasCssClass(this IAttributeAccessor accessor, string className)
public static void AddCssClass(this IAttributeAccessor accessor, string className)
public static void RemoveCssClass(this IAttributeAccessor accessor, string className)
the dilemma here has to do with that the CssClass property of WebControl doesn't seem to reflect accordingly when you access the property through the IAttributeAccessor interface.
i.e.
WebControl c;
c.CssClass = "hello-world";
Debug.Assert(((IAttributeSelector)c).GetAttribute("class") != "hello-world");
I did some digging around with the .NET Reflector and came to the conclusion that the assertion will hold. I can modify the same underlying HTML property class in two distinct ways. Thus my problem, which overload do I use, or rather, which overload does the compiler use?
Now, System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebControl implements System.Web.UI.IAttributeAccessor and this is why I ask the question, which overload will be used? Or is the call ambiguous between the two?
I always imagine that the compiler/run-time calculated the distance to pick one type over the other.
Say TextBox, which derives from WebControl that implements IAttributeAccessor would call the WebControl overload because the distance to WebControl is shorter, strictly speaking.
I found some stuff on MSDN about this, however, it doesn't say what it means to be better than or worse than. So what's going to happen when I call.
TextBox c;
c.AddCssClass("hello-world");
?
EDIT
I ended up changing the IAttributeAccessor to HtmlControl instead, becuase it still covers most cases and would be less confusing for other developers on my team.
IntelliSense actually displayed both as possible overloads, while only one, in fact, is possible.