views:

167

answers:

4

I have an abstract class Employee and 2 other classes that extend it (Developer and Manager). My problem is that when I whenever I create a Manager

Employee man = new Manager(1234567, 30, "Bob", "Pie")

and try to set it in the Manager field of a new Developer,

Employee codemonkey = new Developer(1234568, 20, "Code", "Monkey", (Manager)man)

I keep getting the ArgumentException that my Manager is null. I did some checks and it somehow becomes null when I try to set it with the Manager property in the constructor. Any advice as to why I'm getting this error would be greatly appreciated. TIA!

The code for each is below:

//Employee Class

public abstract class Employee
{
    string firstName, lastName;
    int id, yearsEmployed;

    //Names must be non-empty
    public string FirstName
    {
        get { return firstName; }
        set
        {
            if (!value.Equals(""))
            {
                firstName = value;
            }
            else
                throw new ArgumentException("name cannot be empty");
        }
    }
    public string LastName
    {
        get { return lastName; }
        set
        {
            if (!value.Equals(""))
            {
                lastName = value;
            }
            else
                throw new ArgumentException("name cannot be empty");
        }
    }
    // IDs must be strings consisting of exactly seven digits.
    public int ID
    {
        get { return id; }
        set
        {
            if (value.ToString().Length == 7)
            {
                id = value;
            }
            else
                throw new ArgumentException("ID must consist of 7 digits");
        }
    }
    // Years employed must always be non-negative.
    public int YearsEmployed
    {
        get { return yearsEmployed; }
        set
        {
            if (value >= 0)
            {
                yearsEmployed = value;
            }
            else
                throw new ArgumentException("Year employed must be non-negative");
        }
    }
    //Constructor
    public Employee(int id, int yearsEmployed,
                    string firstName, string lastName)
    {
        this.FirstName = firstName;
        this.LastName = lastName;
        this.ID = id;
        this.YearsEmployed = yearsEmployed;
    }
    public abstract int GetLevel { get; }
    public abstract string GetTitle { get; }
    public string GetFullTitle { get { return GetTitle + " " + GetLevel; } }
}

//Developer class:

 public class Developer : Employee
{
    Manager manager;

    //Manager cannot be null
    public Manager Manager
    {
        get { return manager; }
        set
        {
            if (manager != null)
            {
                manager = value;
            }
            else
                throw new ArgumentException("Manager cannot be null");
        }
    }

    //Constructor
    public Developer(int id, int yearsEmployed, string firstName,
                    string lastName, Manager manager)
        : base(id, yearsEmployed, firstName, lastName)
    {
        Console.WriteLine("manager is not null:" + manager != null); //True here
        this.Manager = manager; // manager is null here
    }

    public override int GetLevel
    {
        get { return (this.YearsEmployed + 1) / 3; }
    }

    public override string GetTitle
    {
        get { return "Developer"; }
    }
}

//Manager Class

public class Manager : Employee
{
    //Constructor
    public Manager(int id, int yearsEmployed,
                    string firstName, string lastName)
        : base(id, yearsEmployed, firstName, lastName) { }

    public override int GetLevel
    {
        get { return (YearsEmployed + 1) / 2; }
    }

    public override string GetTitle
    {
        get { return "Manager"; }
    }
}
+8  A: 

Don't you want to say:

if (value != null)

instead of

if (manager != null)

The manager field will be initialized to null. The value keyword represents the data that is being passed to the property.

Adam Crossland
+1  A: 

you are never setting the value of the field manager, only the property Manager, so in the property when you check the value of manager it is null as it has not been set. you could set the field manager in the constructor:

this.manager=manager

and check for the value in the property

if (value!=null)
{
     manager =value;
}

(you need to do this anyway, otherwise the value you give to the property is never used and will never be updated)

depending on if you want the Manager to be able to be changed.

Sam Holder
+2  A: 

Change

 if (manager != null) 

To

 if (value != null) 
klausbyskov
+1  A: 

In Developer.Manager's setter change

if (manager != null)

to

if (value != null)
Curt Nichols