ansaurus

Question

clientscript.registerclientscriptblock or include not adding to the page head?

Answer 1

A:

If you're using master pages, the job is as simple as this...

<!-- in master page -->
<head>
    <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="/styles/common1.css" />
    <script type="text/javascript" src="/scripts/common1.js"></script>
    <asp:contentplaceholder id="ExtraStylesAndScripts" runat="server" />
</head>

<!-- on child pages -->
<asp:content contentplaceholderid="ExtraStylesAndScripts" runat="server">    
    <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="/styles/extra1.css" />
    <script type="text/javascript" src="/scripts/extra1.js"></script>
</asp:content>

Here's a link about custom header elements in ASP.NET

Josh Stodola 2010-02-03 14:17:19

hi, thanksi was trying to avoid that. but maybe ill have to go through the many pages and do that.. not using master pages for these onesmost annoying

nat 2010-02-03 14:33:57

Sorry, it is the only way. I guess I don't see why it is so crucial for your scripts to be in the `<head>` section anyways.

Josh Stodola 2010-02-03 14:49:10

its because the scripts i am adding via the register function are the jquery libs and the like.. and the pages themselves have their own functions.. that are using the libraries in the head. so none of them run, as the libraries are included below. which doesnt work.thanks for your suggestion though, will be making master pages for all these pages as soon as i get enough time.. clear my todo's

nat 2010-03-01 16:38:27

ansaurus

tags:

views:

answers:

clientscript.registerclientscriptblock or include not adding to the page head?

related questions