I noticed in this image from the Kiln site (http://fogcreek.com/Kiln/i/en-US/LearnMore/CodeOrganization.png) that the repositories are named stable, qa and devel. Is there any reasoning behind this? Or is there a better/different way that's more accepted?
+4
A:
Have a read of this post on the Kiln StackExchange site which explains why they use stable and devel. It also suggests other ways of structuring your repositories.
We keep a devel and stable repository. New features go into devel and eventually get merged forward to stable, while bug fixes go into stable and get merged back into devel.
Pauk
2010-02-09 16:17:50