What is the latest data on ASP.Net MVC performance? How does it scale and perform under heavy load?
I have profiled my ASP.Net MVC 1 application and most of the time is wasted in System.Web.MVC assembly, so I thought it might be a concern.
+5
A:
"MVC uses more time than nHibernate"
This can't be true.
Even with a simple select with nHibernate your probably looking at more than 50ms for connection, query translation, query execution, and finally materialization against MSSQL.
A base MVC request against with no logic returns in < 1 ms.
jfar
2010-04-10 12:52:16
+1 I support this, according to my experience with MVC and NHibernate, I have never encountered a situation where MVC code is slower than NHibernate.@Heavy Wave: May be some thing more serious is going on in your MVC code!
Mahesh Velaga
2010-04-10 15:39:01
Yeah, MVC methods were waiting for nHibernate, that's what was going on. Still would be nice to see some data on MVCs performance.
HeavyWave
2010-04-11 03:06:45
A:
We have a high traffic ASP.NET MVC website and it performs well.
Dont worry about the time spent in MVC itself. This will not be an issue.
The main issue I see for even more traffic on our site is that we can only cache complete Actions. But right now this all looks better then expected.
Malcolm Frexner
2010-04-11 18:49:04
+1
A:
In fact this site (stack overflow) is done in asp.net MVC 1. How does it seem speed wise?
Solmead
2010-04-12 05:18:36