tags:

views:

178

answers:

5

I have two independent projects in my Visual Studio 2008 solution. Both has its own App.config. But in one project, I need one or two properties defined in another project's App.config. Is it possible to share part of the App.config contents from other project?

A: 

In that situation, I would think using a Database to store some configuration data would be ideal. Each app does its own thing, but they look to a shared database to get those common pieces of information.

EDIT: I spoke too soon! Looks like both the OP and I learned something about config files =D

Tejs
+8  A: 

Yes - of course. Any configuration section can be "externalized" - e.g.:

<appSettings configSource="AppSettings.DEV.config" />
<connectionStrings configSource="MyConnection.config" />

or

<system.net>
   <mailSettings>
      <smtp configSource="smtp.TEST.config" />

vs.

<system.net>
   <mailSettings>
      <smtp configSource="smtp.PROD.config" />

Any configuration section can be put into a separate file that can be shared between projects - but no configuration section groups, and unfortunately, it's sometimes a bit tricky to know which is which.

Also, in some cases, Visual Studio will complain (using red wavy underlines) that the "configSource" supposedly isn't valid - but it is - it's defined on the ConfigurationSection object in the .NET config system.

UPDATE:
another feature that hardly enough developers seem to know and use is the ability in Visual Studio to add existing files from a different project as a link:

alt text

With this, you can add links to files into your local project, and they'll always be kept up to date. Great productivity booster if you need to do some file-level sharing (like for common configuration files or such)!

marc_s
but the target file, such as "MyConnection.config" in your example, must be in the same directory or subdirectory?
5YrsLaterDBA
@5YrsLaterDBA: yes, it has to be in the same directory or a sub-directory thereof. It can be a "linked" file in Visual Studio, however - or a hard link on disk (NTFS link - a "pointer" to another file that looks and acts like "The Real Thing")
marc_s
Hmmm... I wish I had though of mentioning linking. lol. but you left out something important, marc.
Sky Sanders
A: 

Try this:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<configuration>
  <appSettings file="PROD.config">
    <add key="common.Currency" value="GBP" />
  </appSettings>
</configuration>
Damian Powell
yeah, but the "file=" attribute is only valid on the <appSettings> section - nothing else can be put into external files with that method.....
marc_s
+1  A: 

Only the "running" app.config is used, but you can go external like marc_s says.

You can also create a .Settings file that's "shared". Go to the "shared" project properties, the Settings tab on the left, create a setting with Application scope, and set the Access Modifier on top to Public. In your other project you can then use ClassLibrary1.Properties.Settings.Default.SettingName to access it. It will be strongly typed, but you may need it at compile time.

Nelson
A: 

Something I like to do, especially when trying to coordinate ServiceModel elements between libraries and tests is to use configSource to fragment the config in the target library and simply link/copy always the fragments in my test projects.

That way I only maintain in one location.

You could take it one step farther and simply have a common directory in the solution and link the fragments in all projects.

Sky Sanders