optimize a program with inotify

Question

hello everybody i write a program by inotify to check file change in loop for grab any changes to that. but i think this can be done better. can anybody write this code better?

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <linux/inotify.h>
#include <sys/select.h>
#define EVENT_SIZE  ( sizeof (struct inotify_event) )
#define EVENT_BUF_LEN     ( 1024 * ( EVENT_SIZE + 16 ) )
int event_check (int fd)
{
  fd_set rfds;
  FD_ZERO (&rfds);
  FD_SET (fd, &rfds);
  /* Wait until an event happens or we get interrupted 
     by a signal that we catch */
  return select (FD_SETSIZE, &rfds, NULL, NULL, NULL);
  }

int main( )
{
  int length, i = 0;
  int fd;
  int wd;
while(1){
i=0;
  fd = inotify_init();

  if ( fd < 0 ) {
    perror( "inotify_init" );
  }

  wd = inotify_add_watch( fd, "/tmp/test", IN_CLOSE_WRITE);
    if (event_check (fd) > 0)
    {
        char buffer[EVENT_BUF_LEN];
        int count = 0;
        length = read( fd, buffer, EVENT_BUF_LEN ); 
        if ( length < 0 ) {
            perror( "read" );
          } 
         while ( i < length ) {     struct inotify_event *event = ( struct inotify_event * ) &buffer[ i ]; 
            printf( "New file %s Editted.\n", event->name );
            i += EVENT_SIZE + event->len;
          }
    }
}
    inotify_rm_watch( fd, wd );
   close( fd );
}

Answer 1

I've never used inotify, so its possible that this might be wrong but here's a couple of changes that I think might "improve" your code.

1. I don't think there's any reason to put either inotify_init or inotify_add_watch inside the loop. Just do this initialisation work once, before the loop.

2. I'm not sure why you've created the event_check function. You aren't specifying a timeout and you're only using a single file descriptor, so I think read will give you the same funcionality.

Answer 2

i put either inotify_init or inotify_add_watch inside the loop because when outside of that only grab two of changes, i don't know why. this code works good but can be better, i write a network management program and cant optimize this code now.