What's the best way to get the contents of the mixed "body" element in the code below? The element might contain either XHTML or text, but I just want its contents in string form. The XmlElement type has the InnerXml property which is exactly what I'm after.

The code as written almost does what I want, but includes the surrounding <body>...</body> element, which I don't want.

XDocument doc = XDocument.Load(new StreamReader(s));
var templates = from t in doc.Descendants("template")
                where t.Attribute("name").Value == templateName
                select new
                   Subject = t.Element("subject").Value,
                   Body = t.Element("body").ToString()

Is it possible to use the System.Xml namespace objects to get the job done here instead of using LINQ? As you already mentioned, XmlNode.InnerXml is exactly what you need.

Greg Hurlman
+1  A: 

@Greg: It appears you've edited your answer to be a completely different answer. To which my answer is yes, I could do this using System.Xml but was hoping to get my feet wet with LINQ to XML.

I'll leave my original reply below in case anyone else wonders why I can't just use the XElement's .Value property to get what I need:

@Greg: The Value property concatenates all the text contents of any child nodes. So if the body element contains only text it works, but if it contains XHTML I get all the text concatenated together but none of the tags.

Mike Powell
+4  A: 

I ended up using this:

Body = t.Element("body").Nodes().Aggregate("", (b, node) => b += node.ToString());
Mike Powell
SWEET!!! That rocks.
That will do a lot of string concatenation - I'd prefer Vin's use of StringBuilder myself. The manual foreach is not a negative.
Marc Gravell

@Mike code block afaik is just 4 spaces. edit: bah! mine didn't work either

var codeblock = true;

ok i figured it out. 4 spaces for code, then 2 returns. then your text

Darren Kopp
+6  A: 

How about using this "extension" method on XElement? worked for me !

public static string InnerXml(this XElement element)
    StringBuilder innerXml = new StringBuilder();

    foreach (XNode node in element.Nodes())
        // append node's xml string to innerXml
    return innerXml.ToString();

OR use a little bit of Linq

public static string InnerXml(this XElement element)
      StringBuilder innerXml = new StringBuilder();
      doc.Nodes().ToList().ForEach( node => innerXml.Append(node.ToString()));
      return innerXml.ToString();

Note: The code above has to use element.Nodes() as opposed to element.Elements(). Very important thing to remember the difference between the two. element.Nodes() gives you everything like XText, XAttribute etc, but XElement only an Element.

Got 2 downvotes on this, not sure why?

Wondering if (notice I got rid of the b+= and just have b+)

t.Element( "body" ).Nodes()
 .Aggregate( "", ( b, node ) => b + node.ToString() );

might be slightly less efficient than

string.Join( "", t.Element.Nodes()
                  .Select( n => n.ToString() ).ToArray() );

Not 100% sure...but glancing at Aggregate() and string.Join() in Reflector...I think I read it as Aggregate just appending a returning value, so essentially you get:

string = string + string

versus string.Join, it has some mention in there of FastStringAllocation or something, which makes me thing the folks at Microsoft might have put some extra performance boost in there. Of course my .ToArray() call my negate that, but I just wanted to offer up another suggestion.

+8  A: 

I think this is a much better method (in VB, shouldn't be hard to translate):

Given an XElement x:

Dim xReader = x.CreateReader
Daniel Straight
Nice! This is a lot faster than some of the other methods proposed (I tested them all - see my answer for details). Although all of them do the job, this one does it the fastest - even seens faster than System.Xml.Node.InnerXml itself!
Luke Sampson
This small code snippet was very helpful, this should have been the accepted answer.
Frank Rosario

you know? the best thing to do is to back to CDATA :( im looking at solutions here but i think CDATA is by far the simplest and cheapest, not the most convenient to develop with tho

+3  A: 

Keep it simple and efficient:

String.Concat(node.Nodes().Select(x => x.ToString()).ToArray())
  • Aggregate is memory and performance inefficient when concatenating strings
  • Using Join("", sth) is using two times bigger string array than Concat... And looks quite strange in code.
  • Using += looks very odd, but apparently is not much worse than using '+' - probably would be optimized to the same code, becase assignment result is unused and might be safely removed by compiler.
  • StringBuilder is so imperative - and everybody knows that unnecessary "state" sucks.
Marcin Kosieradzki
+14  A: 

I wanted to see which of these suggested solutions performed best, so I ran some comparative tests. Out of interest, I also compared the LINQ methods to the plain old System.Xml method suggested by Greg. The variation was interesting and not what I expected, with the slowest methods being more than 3 times slower than the fastest.

The results were, ordered fastest to slowest:

  1. CreateReader - Daniel Straight (0.113 seconds)
  2. Plain old System.Xml - Greg Hurlman (0.134 seconds)
  3. Aggregate with string concatenation - Mike Powell (0.324 seconds)
  4. StringBuilder - Vin (0.333 seconds)
  5. String.Join on array - Terry (0.360 seconds)
  6. String.Concat on array - Marcin Kosieradzki (0.364)


I used a single XML document with 20 identical nodes (called 'hint'):

  <strong>Thinking of using a fake address?</strong>
  <br />
  Please don't. If we can't verify your address we might just
  have to reject your application.

The numbers shown as seconds above are the result of extracting the "inner XML" of the 20 nodes, 1000 times in a row, and taking the average (mean) of 5 runs. I didn't include the time it took to load and parse the XML into an XmlDocument (for the System.Xml method) or XDocument (for all the others).

The LINQ algorithms I used were: (C# - all take an XElement "parent" and return the inner XML string)


var reader = parent.CreateReader();
return reader.ReadInnerXml();

Aggregate with string concatenation:

return parent.Nodes().Aggregate("", (b, node) => b += node.ToString());


StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
foreach(var node in parent.Nodes()) {
return sb.ToString();

String.Join on array:

return String.Join("", parent.Nodes().Select(x => x.ToString()).ToArray());

String.Concat on array:

return String.Concat(parent.Nodes().Select(x => x.ToString()).ToArray());

I haven't shown the "Plain old System.Xml" algorithm here as it's just calling .InnerXml on nodes.


If performance is important (e.g. lots of XML, parsed frequently), I'd use Daniel's CreateReader method every time. If you're just doing a few queries, you might want to use Mike's more concise Aggregate method.

If you're using XML on large elements with lots of nodes (maybe 100's), you'd probably start to see the benefit of using StringBuilder over the Aggregate method, but not over CreateReader. I don't think the Join and Concat methods would ever be more efficient in these conditions because of the penalty of converting a large list to a large array (even obvious here with smaller lists).

Luke Sampson
Wow, interesting stuff. Thanks for taking the time to run these!
Mike Powell
+1  A: 

Personally, I ended up writing an InnerXml extension method using the Aggregate method:

public static string InnerXml(this XElement thiz)
   return thiz.Nodes().Aggregate( string.Empty, ( element, node ) => element += node.ToString() );

My client code is then just as terse as it would be with the old System.Xml namespace:

var innerXml = myXElement.InnerXml();
Martin R-L
public static string InnerXml(this XElement xElement)
    //remove start tag
    string innerXml = xElement.ToString().Trim().Replace(string.Format("<{0}>", xElement.Name), "");
    ////remove end tag
    innerXml = innerXml.Trim().Replace(string.Format("</{0}>", xElement.Name), "");
    return innerXml.Trim();