I wrote:
a:
-b
-c
Parser understood it as:
!!map {
? !!str "a"
: !!seq [
!!str "b",
!!str "c"
]
}
But I meant:
!!map {
? !!str "a"
: !!null ""
}
!!seq [
!!str "b",
!!str "c"
]
The specification says:
The “-”, “?” and “:” characters used to denote block collection entries are perceived by people to be part of the indentation. This is handled on a case-by-case basis by the relevant productions.
So both interpretations are permissible? If not, can you point out section in specification which prevents it?
Depending on "case-by-case basis by the relevant productions" ? What are "relevant productions"?