Hi,
which XSLT engine are you using? If you are using the .NET engine and Visual Studio you could use the XSLT profiler available for VS 2008 which is a very useful (The Team System edition of VS is needed though).
Other excellent profiling tools are Altova's XML Spy and Oxygen.
If you would post your XSLT it would be easier to tell you where possible bottlenecks are. In general be careful with XPath expressions such as '//', preceding::* and following::*. Some more rules and best-practices:
- Avoid repeated use of
"//item"
.
- Don't evaluate the same node-set more than once; save it in a variable.
- Avoid
<xsl:number>
if you can. For example, by using position().
- Use
<xsl:key>
, for example to solve grouping problems.
- Avoid complex patterns in template rules. Instead, use
within the rule.
- Be careful when using the
preceding[-sibling]
or
following[-sibling]
axes. This often
indicates an algorithm with n-squared
performance.
- Don't sort the same node-set more than once. If necessary, save it
as a result tree fragment and access
it using the
node-set()
extension
function.
- To output the text value of a simple
#PCDATA
element, use
<xsl:value-of>
in preference to
<xsl:apply-templates>
.
(from http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect4/N9883.html#d15756e150)
Following these rules will typically result in very efficient XSLT and you possibly won't need to use a profiler at all.
Concerning your question about XSLT in the browser: I wouldn't recommend it because first you are not platform independent (not every browser might support it or some browsers may only support it with a poorly performing engine) and second you can't control the engine used.