MVC Framework for ASP.net 3.0?

tags:

.net
asp.net

views:

answers:

+2 Q:

MVC Framework for ASP.net 3.0?

Hello,

I am currently stuck with ASP.net 3.0, which means that I cannot use ASP.net MVC and ADO.net EF. While I can replace EF with Subsonic or ActiveRecord, I wonder what you guys recommend for MVC? I am interested in nice URLs and separation between View and Controller, two things that I always found hard with Webforms.

For now, I will give Castle MonoRail a spin, but if you have more suggestions i'd be happy as well.

+2 A:

Castle MonoRail seems indeed to be the only serious MVC Framework for .net 2.0/3.0, so I'll go with that.

Michael Stum 2009-01-18 04:36:52

that's what i would suggest. y cant you use 3.5?

cottsak 2009-01-18 05:32:11

Not my server, no control over what goes on it and what not.

Michael Stum 2009-01-18 13:33:07

I was looking into Castle MonoRail myself. I'd say that it's your best bet at the moment.

EndangeredMassa 2009-01-18 22:04:00

+1 A:

There's a hacky, unofficial, unsupported workaround that allows you to deploy ASP.NET MVC on .NET 2.0 (and possibly .NET 3.0).

http://www.hanselman.com/blog/DeployingASPNETMVCOnASPNET20.aspx

EndangeredMassa 2009-01-18 04:41:30

Thanks. I believe to remember that this did not work with the MVC beta anymore, but I did not double check. Really hacky though

Michael Stum 2009-01-18 04:51:32

Yeah, it's really not ideal.

EndangeredMassa 2009-01-18 05:17:29

ansaurus

tags:

views:

answers:

MVC Framework for ASP.net 3.0?

related questions