views:

749

answers:

5

What exactly is meant by the term "rich user interface"?

Does it mean the same thing when referring to user-interfaces as it does when referring to, say, communications frameworks?

Does it imply that a user-interface can be "poor"? (as in the opposite of rich, not as in poorly designed)

A: 

In my understanding, it generally implies that the UI can do "heavy" things.

Compare clicking a link, waiting, and getting a full-screen refresh containing new information, to clicking a link, and having the new information pop up, perhaps even animate into view, right there.

More features, faster responses, and more "eye candy" are some of the things I associate with the term.

unwind
+5  A: 

From Wiktionary.

(computing) Elaborate, having complex formatting, multimedia, or depth of interaction.

Ólafur Waage
+4  A: 
User
Richness doesn’t imply complexity.
Gumbo
A: 

A "rich" user interface is a web term which describes the next generation of Web interfaces. In the old days, HTML Web Pages were static bodies of text with some images and not a whole lot of interactivity.

The Web today is completely different...with pages providing different levels of interactivity. A "rich" user interface strives to provide the user with a highly interactive, highly stylized, highly usable interface whereas a traditional web application might have been clunky and required numerous page refreshes to complete a task.

Justin Niessner
+2  A: 

rich | not so rich

Note: "rich" is not necessarily the same as "better".

Fredrik Mörk
Hmm, the Google page actually looks a bit fuller than the Microsoft page.
@dehmann: it sure does, and yet it seems more lightweight in terms of client-side functionality (hence my note on "rich" vs. "better").
Fredrik Mörk