views:

1103

answers:

3

We are "upgrading" the systems at the company, moving from SourceSafe/BugNet/... (yeahy!) to some more serious systems. TFS is too expensive. We have come down to comparing OnTime vs Gemini. They both seem OK with an "OK" price-tag. We will of-course download and try them out both, but it would be nice with comments from experienced users. To me, they seem quite equal.

Has anyone used both, and can compare the two against each-other? If you would recommend one of these, which one, and why? Any other experiences with these systems? (Especially Gemini, seems hard to find reviews regarding this-one..?)

(We are talking about a smaller dev-team, max 8 dev in a project at a time, a couple of testers and some stakeholders/managers etc... Several projects running simultaneously. Need to be able to integrate to Visual Studio, Subversion with feed-back to the issue tracker etc)

Thanks for your time!

+1  A: 

Hi, Have a look at this. I hope will clear off your doubts. Gemini

Thanks for the link! It was interesting, but not quite what I was looking for. Do you know any more in-depth review of Gemini? Especially compared to other tools?
Rolle
+2  A: 

Gemini is great, we selected gemini over many other bug tracking systems...

main features we liked:
user interface
extensibility (API's, REST based)
addon products (visual studio, outlook plugins)
source control integration (subversion)

source code available (asp.net c#), easy to setup and great support.

dnndeveloper
A: 

Take a look at Project Kaiser (short demo available). It is fast, web-based, supports embedded wiki, forums and chats. And it is free for 5 users :)

Michael