(For the sake of convenience, this answer assumes myList implements IEnumerable<string>; replace string with the appropriate type where necessary.)
If you're using .NET 3.5, use the First() extension method:
string first = myList.First();
If you're not sure whether there are any values or not, you can use the FirstOrDefault() method which will return null (or more generally, the default value of the element type) for an empty sequence.
You can still do it "the long way" without a foreach loop:
using (IEnumerator<string> iterator = myList.GetEnumerator())
{
if (!iterator.MoveNext())
{
throw new WhateverException("Empty list!");
}
string first = iterator.Current;
}
It's pretty ugly though :)
In answer to your comment, no, the returned iterator is not positioned at the first element initially; it's positioned before the first element. You need to call MoveNext() to move it to the first element, and that's how you can tell the difference between an empty sequence and one with a single element in.
EDIT: Just thinking about it, I wonder whether this is a useful extension method:
public static bool TryFirst(this IEnumerable<T> source, out T value)
{
using (IEnumerator<T> iterator = source.GetEnumerator())
{
if (!iterator.MoveNext())
{
value = default(T);
return false;
}
value = iterator.Current;
return true;
}
}