Does GCC have a built-in compile time assert?

Question

Our existing compile-time assert implementation is based on negative array index, and it provides poor diagnostic output on GCC. C++0x's static_assert is a very nice feature, and the diagnostic output it provides is much better. I know GCC has already implemented some C++0x features. Does anyone know if static_assert is among them and if it is then since what GCC version?

Answer 1

according to this page. gcc has had static_assert since 4.3

Answer 2

The following code works as expected with g++ 4.4.0 when compiled with the -std=c++0x flag:

int main() {
    static_assert( false, "that was false" );
}

it displays:

x.cpp: In function 'int main()':
x.cpp:2: error: static assertion failed: "that was false"

Answer 3

If you need to use a gcc version which does not support it you can use

#include <boost/static_assert.hpp>

BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT( /* assertion */ )

Basically, what boost does is this:

Declare (but don't define!) a

template< bool Condition > struct STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE;

Define a specialization for the case that the assertion holds:

template <> struct STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE< true > {};

Then you can define STATIC_ASSERT like this:

#define STATIC_ASSERT(Condition) \ 
  enum { dummy = sizeof(STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE< (bool)(Condition) > }

The trick is that if Condition is false the compiler needs to instantiate the struct

STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE< false >

in order to compute its size, and this fails since it is not defined.

Answer 4

This doesn't really answer the question, but I like compile-time asserts based on switch-case better, e.g.

#define COMPILE_TIME_ASSERT(cond) do { switch(0) { case 0: case cond: ; } } while (0)

Works also in C and not only in C++.

Answer 5

If you have an older gcc or use an older C++ standard, or use C, then you can emulate static_assert as described here: http://www.pixelbeat.org/programming/gcc/static_assert.html