On a more constructive note, I recommend you install SQL Express with Advanced Services (the download that includes SQL Server Reporting Services aka SSRS).
While SQL Express is limited in the number of concurrent users it can support, the following observations are salient:
The licence for SSRS obtained as part of SQL Express only requires that it be deployed as part of SQL Express. There is nothing forbidding connection to other data sources or requiring that a report obtain data from SQL Server.
The abovementioned version of SSRS has no intrinsic restrictions on user connections. All limitations are imposed on the SQL Express database engine.
SSRS uses ADO.NET
ADO.NET includes, out of the box, drivers for Oracle, Jet (Access), OLEDB and ODBC
My point here is that you can connect the free version of SSRS to any back-end to which you can connect ADO.NET, which includes (for example) MySQL.
I use SSRS extensively at work both for inward facing reports and for outward facing reports embedded in ASP.NET applications that provide bureau services to large numbers of paying customers. In our case it happens that the backing store is a licensed copy of Microsoft SQL Server 2008, but this is incidental to the technical merits of our reporting solution.
There is a long list of capabilities that Crystal Reports claims to support but which either don't work or which require a staggeringly expensive licence if you want more than five users. You can't even trust CR to do SQL correctly.
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM SOMETABLE WHERE 1=0
should produce zero rows but it doesn't, it produces one row. The built-in query engine doesn't even work correctly, and a team that screws up something a bunch of amateurs can do for free (MySQL) has no hope of getting anything you'd describe as performance out of their code.
As for the alleged support, dialog resize bugs have gone uncorrected for more than ten years after they were first publicly documented. If you get out your credit card and pay the extortionate ransoms demanded (I too would want handsome pay to support such a horror) you will find yourself talking to someone who claims his name is David, but inexplicably pronounces it "Dah-feet", and who doesn't even understand your question, much less have an answer.
The SSRS support situation is fairly similar, but it actually works so you don't really need much.
SSRS, on the other hand, does everything that CR claims to. It is not without bugs, but they are delightfully few, and they seldom survive more than one release cycle.
The SSRS designer UI is hosted within the Visual Studio IDE. It is pretty in typical Microsoft style, but more than this it is quite well thought out, incorporating several simple but fundamental departures from traditional report designers. For example, to present tabular data you define a table rather than fiddling about with individual text boxes. As a result you don't have to screw around trying to line them up, and putting borders on them is a trivial stylesheet exercise.
Look, SSRS is free, it actually does all the things CR claims to, and you can connect it to anything for which you can get an ODBC driver. This is a no brainer.