It's hard enough to find reliable numbers as to general adoption of the .NET framework. This questions concerns an even more specific case: what's the situation among home users?
I am wondering wether .NET is a good choice for a desktop application when targetting home users?
Assuming the application in question is a small-medium sized app (download, install & run), and the size of the framework is considerably larger, having the user download and install the framework just for the sake of that application seems like a big thumbs-down.
I know that Vista ships with .NET 3.0 out of the box (2003 ships with 1.1, but it's a server version), but that's just not enough considering that XP still has over 60% market share, including non-Windows systems (Accroding to hitslink.com, as of May this year).
Here's another thing: I almost can't think of any home-user targetted software that uses .NET (There's Catalyst, what else?). Why is that? Is this a clue that the framework isn't really that popular among home users?