For the first part, use the answer from @kperryua to construct the NSDate objects you want to compare with. From your answer to your own question, it sounds like you have that figured out.
For actually comparing the dates, I totally agree with @Tim's comment on your answer. It's more concise yet actually exactly equivalent to your code, and I'll explain why.
+ (BOOL) date:(NSDate*)date isBetweenDate:(NSDate*)beginDate andDate:(NSDate*)endDate {
return (([date compare:beginDate] != NSOrderedAscending) && ([date compare:endDate] != NSOrderedDescending));
}
Although it may seem that the return statement must evaluate both operands of the && operator, this is actually not the case. The key is "short-circuit evaluation", which is implemented in a wide variety of programming languages, and certainly in C. Basically, the operators &
and &&
"short circuit" if the first argument is 0 (or NO, nil, etc.), while |
and ||
do the same if the first argument is not 0. If date
comes before beginDate
, the test returns NO
without even needing to compare with endDate
. Basically, it does the same thing as your code, but in a single statement on one line, not 5 (or 7, with whitespace).
This is intended as constructive input, since when programmers understand the way their particular programming language evaluates logical expressions, they can construct them more effectively without so much about efficiency. However, there are similar tests that would be less efficient, since not all operators short-circuit. (Indeed, most cannot short-circuit, such as numerical comparison operators.) When in doubt, it's always safe to be explicit in breaking apart your logic, but code can be much more readable when you let the language/compiler handle the little things for you.