SubSonic 3.0 - Medium Trust

Question

In June 2009 SubSonic 3.0 was released. Because I'm looking for an ORM solution for my website which is able to work in a medium trust environment this looks an option. From searching this site I noted that SubSonic 2.0 is able to work in a medium trust environment. With respect to 3.0 I could not find this on the web.

Does anyone has any experience yet with 3.0 in a medium trust environment (at an ISP)? And what are the do and don't issues. I tested this briefly locally but security exceptions were thrown. Before implementing any further this I would like to know because I was already disappointed by Nhibernate an a medium trust environment.

Answer 1

Sorry I meant subsonic 3.0. Sorry for the confusion

Answer 2

We tested this in medium trust and currently there are no issues.

Answer 3

I wanted to test this out. The only issue I had with Active Record was pulling from the 'data context' object. Anytime I pulled from DBContext.TableNames and used a function like Where() or Count() under medium trust, it would throw a SecurityException.

I was successfully able to pull single rows using the constructors, and I was also able to save and delete them using Active Record with no medium trust issues.

For the listing problem, I bugged it here. Feel free to add to it if you have anything. http://github.com/subsonic/SubSonic-3.0/issues/#issue/99

Answer 4

I know there is a new ORM Framework being released this month that supports Medium Trust. FlyweightObjects.NET is also an out-of-the box architecture. You might want to check it out when it releases. link text

Answer 5

I had the same problem and i don't think its been fixed yet

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1438336/subsonic-3-0-medium-trust-issue