views:

137

answers:

4

I'm doing some basic text matching from an input. I need the ability to perform a basic "AND". For "ANY" I split the input by spaces and join each word by the pipe ("|") character but I haven't found a way to tell the regular expression to match any of the words.

switch (searchOption) {
  case "any":
    inputArray = input.split(" ");
    if (inputArray.length > 1) { input = inputArray.join("|"); }
    text = input;
    break;
  case "all":
    inputArray = input.split(" ");
    ***[WHAT TO DO HERE?]***
    text = input;
    break;
  case "exact":
    inputArray = new Array(input);
    text = input;
    break;
}

Seems like it should be easy.

+3  A: 

Do a simple for loop and search for every term, something like this:

var n = inputArray.length;
if (n) {
    for (var i=0; i<n; i++) {
        if (/* inputArray[i] not in text */) {
            break;
        }
    }
    if (i != n) {
        // not all terms were found
    }
}
Gumbo
But judging by the logic of this method, webwires wants a single regex to be used by the `text` variable. Not that I can think of a way to do it!
butterchicken
That would need to generate every possible permutation, and that’s *n*!.
Gumbo
this is how I eventually handled it (though with jQuery) ... just thought that there might have been an easier way.
webwires
+3  A: 

The problem with "and" is: in what combination do you want the words? Can they appear in any order, or must they be in the order given? Can they appear consecutively or can there be other words in between?

These decisions impact heavily what search (or searches) you do.

If you're looking for "A B C" (in order, consecutively), the expression is simply /A B C/. Done!

If you're looking for "A foo B bar C" it might be /A.*?B.*?C/

If you're looking for "B foo A foo C" you'd be better off doing three separate tests for /A/, /B/, and /C/

VoteyDisciple
+1  A: 

My regular expressions cookbook does feature a regular expression that can possibly do this using conditionals. However, it's quite complicated, so I'd go for the currently top rated answer which is iterating over the options. Anyway, trying to adapt their example I think it would be something like:

\b(?:(?:(word1)|(word2))(\b.*?)){2,}(?(1)|(?!))(?(2)|(?!))

No guarantees that this'll work as is, but it's the basic idea I think. See what I mean about complicated?

wds
+4  A: 

Use lookahead. Try this:

if( inputArray.length>1 ) rgx = "(?=.*" + inputArray.join( ")(?=.*" ) + ")";

You'll end up with something like

(?=.*dog)(?=.*cat)(?=.*mouse)

Which should only match if all the words appear, but they can be in any order.

  • The dog ate the cat who ate the mouse.
  • The mouse was eaten by the dog and the cat.
  • Most cats love mouses and dogs.

But not

  • The dog at the mouse.
  • Cats and dogs like mice.

The way it works is that the regex engine scans from the current match point (0) looking for .*dog, the first sub-regex (any number of any character, followed by dog). When it determines true-ness of that regex, it resets the match point (back to 0) and continues with the next sub-regex. So, the net is that it doesn't matter where each word is; only that every word is found.

bill weaver
Nice trick, bill. I actually didn't think javascript's regex supported lookaheads.
Peter Bailey