I have an application that manages the heavy processing for my project, and need to convert it to a "Windows Service." I need to allow running multiple versions instances of the application processing, which seems to be a fairly normal requirement.
I can see at least three approaches to do this:
- Create a single installed directory (EXE, DLLs, config) but install as multiple Services instances from it.
- Have a single Services instance spawn multiple instances of itself after launching, a la Apache.
- Have a single Services instance spawn multiple threads that work within the same process space.
My intention was approach #1, but I kept tripping over the limitations, both in design and especially documentation for Services:
- Are parameters ever passed to OnStart() by the normal Services mechanisms on an unattended system? If so, when/why?
- Passing run-time parameters via the ImageKey registry seems a kludge, is there a better mechanism?
- I got the app to install/uninstall itself as a pair of services ("XYZ #1", "XYZ #2", ...), using the ImageKey to hand it a command line parameter instance number ("-x 1", "-x 2") but I was missing something. When attempting to start the service, it would fail with "The executable program that this service is configured to run in does not implement the service.
So, the questions:
- Is there a concise description of what happens when a service starts, specifically for those situations where the ServiceName is not hard-coded (see Q above).
- Has anyone used approach #1 successfully? Any comments?
NOTE: I've side-stepped the problem by using approach #3, so I can't justify much time figuring this out. But I thought someone might have information on how to implement #1 -- or good reasons why it isn't a good idea.
[Edit] I originally had a 4th option (install multiple copies of the application on the hard drive) but I removed it because it just feels, um, hackish. That's why I said "at least three approaches".
However, unless the app is recompiled, it must dynamically set its ServiceName, hence that has the solution to the third bullet/problem above. So, unless an instance needed to alter it's install files, #1 should work fine with N config files in the directory and a registry entry indicating which the instance should use.