views:

1387

answers:

3

Is there a way to have a common operator for concatenation in Oracle, Postgres and SQL Server.

In Oracle we uses '|', postgres uses '||' and sql server uses '+'.

I've solved the problem in postgres by adding the custom operator '+' to support string concatenation.

Is there a way to add the same operator in Oracle to support string concatenation using the '+' operator.

+3  A: 

'||' certainly works in Oracle, though not apparently SQL Server. (For those who come after us, here's a rosetta stone for SQL: SQL Dialects Reference)

If you're fixing up SQL scripts, I would consider the following solution:

BEFORE:

sql-shell-command < sql-file.sql

(sql-file contains '+' operators)

AFTER:

ansi-sql-shell-command < sql-file.sql


sed -e 's/||/\+/' < sql-file.sql | ms-sql-shell-command

(sql-file contains '||' operators, you'd have to convert your files)

The idea is that you start with SQL in one format, and for the special case, you run a filter over it to transform it to the other format. Theoretically, you could turn all '+'es into '||'s, but since a good proportion of those might be numeric-add rather than string-concatenation, that's unlikely to work as well.

The complexity of your filter depends on what you're doing. If you have arbitrary data in your SQL, then you'd have to get it to avoid substituting in strings. But if you're setting up views it'll probably be fine.

You could use the same technique in programs where the SQL is in strings - write a function in the program to turn it from one form to the other.

ijw
will not work on sql sever
KM
The link doesn't seem to work... =(
Will Marcouiller
@Will, afer my edit, the link works now
KM
+1, that link is great!
KM
+5  A: 

Hi Arun,

You can't overload operators in Oracle. the "+" overload wouldn't work anyway, since Oracle does automatic type conversions ('1'+'1'=2).

The concatenation operator used by Oracle is ||, which is also ANSI-compliant.

There is also the CONCAT function in Oracle and MySQL, I don't know if it exists in other RDBMS but if it does, you could use it to have portable queries.

Vincent Malgrat
MySQL supports the CONCAT() function but PostgreSQL and SQL Server don't. At least, not out of the box: they could be built as stored procedures.
APC
The problem is my current project uses '+' as the string concatenation operator in most of the places. It is works with both postgres ans sql server. Now we want the project to work with oracle also. That is why I need '+' to work in Oracle. If it is not working then we have to change most of our code where we uses '+', to a common operator '||' if it works in all the places. I need a solution which will work in the 3 databases without much changes in the existing system
Arun P Johny
+4  A: 

|| is the SQL Standard concatenation operator (see SQL 2008: 5.2). Use that, and complain if it doesn't work in the system you're using ;-)

Seriously though, you should make other systems use ||, not +. Not only is it more standard, but it's easier to accidentally cause confusion if you use +, especially if any types have to be inferred or and implicit casts are happening.

Consider: '5' + 2

If the system you're using doesn't throw an error on that one, and + means both plus and concatenation, you might be in for some confusing results.

Jeff Davis
So, Microsoft don't support the same standard as everyone else, and he should complain to MS and tell them to change their ways. Yeah, that'll work... ;-)
ijw