Anyone any idea why a generic method which constrains T to class would have boxing instructions in the generates MSIL code?
I was quite surprised by this since surely since T is being constrained to a reference type the generated code should not need to perform any boxing.
Here is the c# code:
protected void SetRefProperty<T>(ref T propertyBackingField, T newValue) where T : class
{
bool isDifferent = false;
// for reference types, we use a simple reference equality check to determine
// whether the values are 'equal'. We do not use an equality comparer as these are often
// unreliable indicators of equality, AND because value equivalence does NOT indicate
// that we should share a reference type since it may be a mutable.
if (propertyBackingField != newValue)
{
isDifferent = true;
}
}
Here is the generated IL:
.method family hidebysig instance void SetRefProperty<class T>(!!T& propertyBackingField, !!T newValue) cil managed
{
.maxstack 2
.locals init (
[0] bool isDifferent,
[1] bool CS$4$0000)
L_0000: nop
L_0001: ldc.i4.0
L_0002: stloc.0
L_0003: ldarg.1
L_0004: ldobj !!T
L_0009: box !!T
L_000e: ldarg.2
L_000f: box !!T
L_0014: ceq
L_0016: stloc.1
L_0017: ldloc.1
L_0018: brtrue.s L_001e
L_001a: nop
L_001b: ldc.i4.1
L_001c: stloc.0
L_001d: nop
L_001e: ret
}
Notice the box !!T instructions.
Anyone any idea why this is being generated?
Anyone any ideas how to avoid this?
Thanks, Phil