Hi!
I'm writing code for a microprocessor with fast integer arithmetic and not so fast float arithmetic. I need to divide an integer by a number from 1 to 9 and convert result back to integer.
I made a float array with members like 0, 1, 0.5, 0.3333 etc. But i think there is MAGIC constants (like 0x55555556) for a numbers except (1/3).
What are this numbers?
I'm assuming, based on the micro-controller tag, you don't have a fast integer divide. My answer is also for unsigned values - it will work for signed values, you just have to limit the numbers used in the tricky bit below.
A good start is divide by 2, 4 and 8. These can be done with right shifts of 1, 2 and 3 bits respectively, assuming your CPU has a logical right-shift instruction.
Secondly, dividing by 1 is just keeping the number as-is. That just leaves, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 9.
Tricky bit starts here:
For the other numbers, you can use the fact that a divide can be replaced by a multiply-and-shift.
Let's say you have a 16-bit processor. To divide by N, you multiply by 256/N and shift right 8 bits:
N = 3, multiply by 85
N = 5, multiply by 51
N = 6, multiply by 43
N = 7, multiply by 37
N = 9, multiply by 28
Take the random example of 72 / 5. Multiply 72 by 51 to get 3672 then shift right 8 bits to get 14.
In order for this to work, your numbers that you're using must not overflow the 16 bits. Since your worst case is multiply-by-85, you can handle numbers up to 771.
The reason this works is because a shift-right of 8 bits is the same as dividing by 256, and:
m * (256 / n) / 256
= m / (n / 256) / 256
= m / n * 256 / 256
= m / n * (256 / 256)
= m / n
If you have a 32-bit processor, the values and ranges change somewhat, since it's 65536/N:
N = 3, multiply by 21,846, right shift 16 bits, max value roughly 196,600.
N = 5, multiply by 13,108.
N = 6, multiply by 10,923.
N = 7, multiply by 9,363.
N = 9, multiply by 7,282.
Again, let's choose the random 20,000 / 7: 20,000 multiplied by 9,363 is 187,260,000 and, when you right shift that 16 bits, you get 2,857 - the real result is 2,857.
The following test program in C shows the accuracy figures for the values given. It uses signed values so is only good up to about 98,000 but you can see that the largest error is 1 and that it occurs at the low point of 13,110 (only 0.008% error).
#include <stdio.h>
int res[5] = {0};
int low[5] = {-1,-1,-1,-1,-1};
int da[] = {3,5,6,7,9};
int ma[] = {21846,13108,10923,9363,7282};
int main (void) {
int n, i;
for (n = 0; n < 98000; n++) {
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(da)/sizeof(da[0]); i++) {
int r1 = n / da[i];
int r2 = (n * ma[i])>>16;
int dif = abs (r1-r2);
if (dif >= 5) {
printf ("%d / %d gives %d and %d\n", n, da[i], r1, r2);
return 1;
}
res[dif]++;
if (low[dif] == -1) {
low[dif] = n;
}
}
}
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(res)/sizeof(res[0]); i++) {
printf ("Difference of %d: %6d, lowest value was %6d\n", i, res[i], low[i]);
}
return 0;
}
This outputs:
Difference of 0: 335874, lowest value was 0
Difference of 1: 154126, lowest value was 13110
Difference of 2: 0, lowest value was -1
Difference of 3: 0, lowest value was -1
Difference of 4: 0, lowest value was -1
If the division instruction on your microcontroller is fast enough, use that. If you need the fractional part of the result, you may be able to use the remainder; on most architectures, the division instruction puts the quotient in one register and the remainder in another.
If your division instruction is not fast enough but the multiplication instruction is, you can use the following technique (and it sounds as if this is the technique you're after). On most architectures, multiplying a 32-bit number by another 32-bit number results in a 64-bit result; the more significant half is stored in one register and the less significant half is stored in the other. You can exploit this by realizing that division by a number n is the same as multiplying by (2^32)/n, then taking the more significant 32 bits of the result. In other words, if you want to divide by 3, you can instead multiply by 0x100000000/3 = 0x55555555, then take the more significant 32 bits of the result.
What you're doing here is really a form of fixed-point arithmetic. Take a look at the Wikipedia article for more information.
A division of an integer by an integer constant can be replaced with a combination of a shift and a multiplication. See this optimization guide for details. Of cource this is useful if it is actully faster on the chip of interest.