Anyone ever flip (<$>)

Question

I found defining the following

(%)  = flip fmap

I can write code like the following:

readFile "/etc/passwd" % lines % filter (not . null)

to me it makes more sense then the alternative

filter (not . null) <$> lines <$> readFile "/etc/passwd"

Obviously its just a matter of order, does anyone else do this? is there a valid reason not to write code like this?

Answer 1

There is a similar function for the Applicative typeclass called <**>; it's a perfectly reasonable thing to want or use for Functor as well. Unfortunately, the semantics are a bit different for <**>, so it can't be directly widened to apply to Functor as well.

Answer 2

-- (.) is to (<$>) as flip (.) is to your (%).

I usually define (&) = flip (.) and it's just like your example, you can apply function composition backwords. Allows for easier to understand points-free code in my opinion.

Answer 3

Personally I wouldn't use such an operators because then I have to learn two orders in which to read programs.