views:

66

answers:

2

Given:

WHERE (@Id Is NULL OR @Id = Table.Id)

If @Id is null: the expression evaluates to true. Does the second part @Id = Table.Id still get considered? or is it sufficient that the expression evaluates to true given that the first part is (which is the case in c#).

This is relevant because of some much more complex OR statements where it is important to know if all parts are getting evaluated.

+1  A: 

Execution plans may not be so great with a query like that. Both will be evaluated.

JonH
I ran the example from the blog Remus posted, "select 'Will not divide by zero!' where (@id is NULL or 1/0=0)" did not cause an error when @id is NULL
CRice
+5  A: 

Sometimes they are, sometimes they aren't. SQL Server does not guarantee boolean operator short circuit, don't rely on it for correctness. See this blog entry: Boolean Operator Short Circuit.

Complex queries that depend on @variables like this are much better written as explicit IF statements:

IF (@id IS NULL)
  SELECT ... FROM ... WHERE ...
ELSE
  SELECT ... FROM ... WHERE ...
Remus Rusanu
great article in blog
CRice