views:

519

answers:

9
var something = {

wtf: null,
omg: null
};

My JavaScript knowledge is still horribly patchy since I last programmed with it, but I think I've relearned most of it now. Except for this. I don't recall ever seeing this before. What is it? And where can I learn more about it?

+16  A: 

It's object literal syntax. The 'wft' and 'omg' are property names while, null and null are the property values.

It is equivalent to:

var something = new Object();
something.wtf = null;
something.omg = null;

Check out mozilla's documentation on object literals: http://developer.mozilla.org/En/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Guide:Literals#Object_Literals

Aaron Maenpaa
Oh I see. So, according to the link, a string is to "" or '' as an object is to { }? Not sure if that's the best way to describe it, but I think I get it now. Thanks.
Daddy Warbox
+2  A: 

I believe its an object with 2 properties, WTF and OMG.

you could say

something.wtf = "myMessage";
alert(something.wtf);

check out JSON.ORG

StingyJack
A: 

This is an example of inline JavaScript object instantiation.

Sergey Ilinsky
+4  A: 

This is an object literal. It's effectively equivalent to the following:

var something = new Object();
something["wtf"] = null;
something["omg"] = null;
Stephen Deken
+5  A: 

It's an Object literal (or, sometimes, a vanilla object in libraries with Hash classes).

Same thing as:

var o = new Object();
o.wtf = null;
o.omg = null;
Jonathan Lonowski
+10  A: 

It is an object literal with two properties. Usually this is how people create associative arrays or hashes because JS doesn't natively support that data structure. Though note that it is still a fully-fledged object, you can even add functions as properties:

var myobj = {
    name: 'SO',
    hello: function() {
        alert(this.name);
    }
};

And you can iterate through the properties using a for loop:

for (i in myobj) {
    // myobj[i]
    // Using the brackets (myobj['name']) is the same as using a dot (myobj.name)
}
Christopher Nadeau
JavaScript doesn't support associative arrays/hashes? I would argue that everything IS an associative array/hash.
Ryono
+6  A: 

Explanation from the "I want an associative Array in Javascript" standpoint (which is what in many cases object literals end up being used for)

From "Mastering Javascript Arrays"

An associative array is an array which uses a string instead of a number as an index.

var normalArray    = [];
    normalArray[1] = 'This is an enumerated array';

    alert(normalArray[1]);   // outputs: This is an enumerated array

var associativeArray           = [];
    associativeArray['person'] = 'John Smith';

    alert(associativeArray['person']); // outputs: John Smith

Javascript does not have, and does not support Associative Arrays. However… All arrays in Javascript are objects and Javascript's object syntax gives a basic emulation of an associative Array. For this reason the example code above will actually work. Be warned that this is not a real array and it has real pitfalls if you try to use it. The 'person' element in the example becomes part of the Array object's properties and methods, just like .length, .sort(), .splice(), and all the other built-in properties and methods.

You can loop through an object's properties with the following loop…

var associativeArray = [];
associativeArray["one"] = "First";
associativeArray["two"] = "Second";
associativeArray["three"] = "Third";
for (i in associativeArray) { 
   document.writeln(i+':'+associativeArray[i]+', '); 
   // outputs: one:First, two:Second, three:Third
};

In the above example, associativeArray.length will be zero because we didn't actually put anything into the Array, we put it into associativeArray's object. associativeArray[0] will be undefined.

The loop in the above example will also pick up any methods, properties, and prototypes which have been added to the array and not just your data. A lot of problems people have with the Prototype library is that their associative arrays break because Prototype adds a few useful Prototype functions to the Array object and for i in x loops pick up those additional methods. That's the pitfal of using Array/objects as a poor man's associative array.

As a final example, the previous code will work regardless of whether you define associativeArray as an Array ([]), an Object({}), a Regular Expression (//), String(""), or any other Javascript object.

The bottom line is -- don't try to use associative arrays, code for what they are -- object properties, not Arrays.

Vinko Vrsalovic
Thanks for the information, but I already mostly know that.
Daddy Warbox
A: 

Am i wrong in thinking this is JSON?

Adam Naylor
I think JSON uses object literals. That doesn't mean object literals are JSON, though.
Daddy Warbox
It's not JSON. JSON requires keys to be surrounded by double quotes. http://www.json.org/ (Keys must be strings and strings must be surrounded by double quotes, as per the specification.)
eyelidlessness
+1  A: 

This code:

var something = {wtf:null}

Has the same effect as:

var something={};
something.wtf=null;

Or for unnecessary verbosity:

var something=new Object();
something.wtf=null;

And it's useful to remember that the last line is the same as

something["wtf"]=null;

So you can use:

var myName="wtf";
something[myName]=null;
Odilon Redo