This is what I use. Got the idea from elsewhere, but the implementation is mine. Pulled from a production project of mine:
class AppConfig
# Loads a YAML configuration file from RAILS_ROOT/config/. The default file
# it looks for is 'application.yml', although if this doesn't match your
# application, you can pass in an alternative value as an argument
# to AppConfig.load.
# After the file has been loaded, any inline ERB is evaluated and unserialized
# into a hash. For each key-value pair in the hash, class getter and setter methods
# are defined i.e., AppConfig.key => "value"
# This allows you to store your application configuration information e.g., API keys and
# authentication credentials in a convenient manner, external to your application source
#
# application.yml example
#
# :defaults: &defaults
# :app_name: Platform
# :app_domain: dev.example.com
# :admin_email: [email protected]
# :development:
# <<: *defaults
# :test:
# <<: *defaults
# :production:
# <<: *defaults
# :app_domain: example.com
#
# For example will result in AppConfig.app_domain => "dev.example.com"
# when Rails.env == "development"
#
class << self
def load(file='application.yml')
configuration_file = File.join Rails.root, 'config', file
File.open(configuration_file) do |configuration|
configuration = ERB.new(configuration.read).result
configuration = YAML.load(configuration)[Rails.env.to_sym]
configuration.each do |key, value|
cattr_accessor key
send "#{key}=", value
end
end if File.exists? configuration_file
end
end
end
AppConfig.load
Create config/initializers/app_config.rb
and paste the above code into it. I'm going to make this into a gem. I figure other people will find it useful.
EDIT: Just saw you wish to edit the config as the app runs via a web based interface. You could do this with this method as both getter and setter methods are defined for each attribute.
in your controller:
def update
params[:configuration].each { |k,v| AppConfig.send "#{k}=", v }
…
end
I don't find a model is the right solution here. Forget about the DB overheard, the idea of being able to instantiate something that controls app configuration doesn't make sense. What's more how you implement it? An instance for each tuple?! It should be a singleton class.