In my application I am trying to display only unique elements of an array of activerecord objects(loss_reports) based on two attributes of a loss_report.
Schema
class Agent < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :loss_reports, :through => policy
end
class LossReport < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :agent
end
I first tried to override the eql? and hash method of a LossReport so that I could do something similar to:
Option 1:
class LossReport ...
def eql? other
self.policy_id == other.policy_id && loss_occurred_on.hash == self.loss_occurred_on
end
def hash
policy_id + loss_occurred_on.hash
end
end
class Agent ...
def unique_losses
loss_reports.to_set
end
end
but quickly removed the code because of ActiveRecord already overriding the methods and my not being sure of the repercussions.
Option 2:
class Agent ...
def unique_losses
loss_reports.sort{|l1,l2| l2.created_at <=> l1.created_at}.group_by{|l| (l.policy_id + l.loss_occurred_on.hash)}.collect{|hl| hl[-1].first}
end
end
Option 3:
class Agent
def unique_losses
hsh_array = []
unique = []
loss_reports.sort{|l1,l2| l2.created_at <=> l1.created_at}.each do |l|
unique << l unless hsh_array.include?(l.hsh)
hsh_array << l.hsh
end
unique
end
end
Benchmark results:
Benchmark.bmbm do |bm|
bm.report("option 2") do
losses.sort{|l1,l2| l2.created_at <=> l1.created_at}.group_by{|l| (l.policy_id + l.loss_occurred_on.hash)}.collect{|hl| hl[-1].first}
end
bm.report("option 3") do
hsh_array,unique = [],[]
losses.sort{|l1,l2| l2.created_at <=> l1.created_at}.each do |l|
unique << l unless hsh_array.include?(l.policy_id+l.loss_occurred_on.hash)
hsh_array << l.policy_id + l.loss_occurred_on.hash
end
end
end
Rehearsal --------------------------------------------
option 2 0.400000 0.000000 0.400000 ( 0.407615)
option 3 0.250000 0.000000 0.250000 ( 0.254399)
----------------------------------- total: 0.650000sec
user system total real
option 2 0.400000 0.000000 0.400000 ( 0.403535)
option 3 0.250000 0.000000 0.250000 ( 0.262578)
Neither way feels right but both work. Which is the best option or is there an even better way?