Is there any reason you might need to use jQuery.noConflict()?
justkt
2010-01-27 14:07:28
There are no additional libraries involved.
Joel Alejandro
2010-01-27 14:11:41
+4
A:
Something in sexylightbox.v2.3.jquery.min.js is causing $ to be set to undefined. If you set a break point before that file loads, $ is correctly an alias for jQuery. I would try loading a version of sexylightbox.v2.3 that hasn't been run through Packer. That way you can properly use Firebug to figure out what is going on.
CalebD
2010-01-27 14:12:06
Loaded the unpacked version. Error is pointed at jQuery.bind(), as described in the question update.
Joel Alejandro
2010-01-27 14:17:48
I don't know the exact cause, but it seems to be some type of closure issue. Change $.makeArray to jQuery.makeArray in the bind function and it should hopefully work. I think this is a bug on behalf of the sexylightbbox author, since that bind function should use jQuery, not $.
CalebD
2010-01-27 14:37:44
A:
I think it might have something to do with Content-Type. It seems that jquery.min.js isn't responding with a content type but sexylightbox.v2.3.jquery.jsdoes: application/x-javascript. Can you get those other requests to use application/x-javascript ?
MDCore
2010-01-27 14:21:08
A:
how about try to download the files on their demo that works already.
files on their demo:
use the files that is seen to work... maybe it will help you...
Reigel
2010-01-27 14:36:17
This isn't the first implementation I do of SexyLightbox and I've based my usage of it from that exact demo.
Joel Alejandro
2010-01-27 14:38:20
Okay... well, I can't find any error on your codes... as far as I see it... and the only thing I can think of are the files... I'll try again... uhm do you have it on localhost or you can give us a link sample?...
Reigel
2010-01-27 14:42:40