I'm not a scripting expert and I was wondering what was an acceptable way to run a script for at most x milliseconds (and yet finish before x milliseconds if the script is done before the timeout).
I solved that problem using Bash in a way that I think is very hacky and I wonder if there's a better way to do it.
Basically I've got one shell script called sleep_kill.sh
that takes a PID as the first argument and a timeout as its second argument and that does this:
sleep $2
kill -9 $1 2> /dev/null 1> /dev/null
So if the PID corresponds to a script that finishes before timing out, nothing is going to be killed (I take it that the OS shall not have the time to be reusing this PID for another [unrelated] process seen that it's 'cycling' through all the process IDs before starting to reuse them).
Anyway, then I call my script that may "hang" or timeout:
command_that_may_hang.sh
PID=$!
sleep_kill.sh $PID .3
wait $PID > /dev/null 2>&1
And I'll be waiting at most 300 ms for command_that_may_hang.sh
. Yet if command_that_may_hang.sh
took only 10 ms to execute, I won't be "stuck" for 300 ms.
It would be great if some shell expert could explain the drawbacks of this approach and what should be done instead.