Using generics in abstract classes.

Question

I'm working on an abstract class where the implementing class needs to implement a list of T. The problem is that this doesn't work:

public class AbstractClass
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public int Name { get; set; }

    public abstract List<T> Items { get; set; }
}

public class Container : AbstractClass
{
    public List<Widgets> Items { get; set; }
}

I'm sure that there is an obvious answer that I'm missing, and I know that I can build an abstract base type to put in the list, but when I use my Linq command to build the list, the abstract type (ItemBase) doesn't play nicely with the .ToList() method. Is what I'm trying to do so unique?

Answer 1

You need the declaration on the class as well, to know what type T is:

public abstract class AbstractClass<T>
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public int Name { get; set; }

    public abstract List<T> Items { get; set; }
}

public class Container : AbstractClass<Widgets>
{
    public List<Widgets> Items { get; set; }
}

You can also restrict what T can be, like say it must implement IWidgets:

public class AbstractClass<T> where T : IWidgets

Answer 2

You need to make AbstractClass generic

public class AbstractClass<T> {
  ...
}

public class Container : AbstractClass<Widgets> { ...
}

Answer 3

You need to specify the type in the abstract class:

public class AbstractClass<T>
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public int Name { get; set; }

    public abstract List<T> Items { get; set; }
}

public class Container : AbstractClass<Widgets>
{
    public List<Widgets> Items { get; set; }
}

Answer 4

You need to define T like so

public class AbstractClass<T>
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public int Name { get; set; }

    public abstract List<T> Items { get; set; }
}

public class Container : AbstractClass<Widget>
{
    public List<Widgets> Items { get; set; }
}

Answer 5

• You need to declare the type T.
• You need to declare the class AbstractClass as abstract.
• You need to use the override keyword.

Try this:

public class Widgets { }

public abstract class AbstractClass<T>
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public int Name { get; set; }

    public abstract List<T> Items { get; set; }
}

public class Container : AbstractClass<Widgets>
{
    public override List<Widgets> Items { get; set; }
}

Answer 6

1. You need to mark AbstractClass abstract, because it contains abstract property

2. Specify the generic type in the AbstractClass declaration

3. Implement abstract property with override

public abstract class AbstractClass<T>
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public int Name { get; set; }

    public abstract List<T> Items { get; set; }
}

public class Container : AbstractClass<Widgets>
{
    public override List<Widgets> Items { get; set; }
}