views:

710

answers:

3

I have the following rails migration:

create_table :articles do |t|
  t.integer :user_id, :allow_null => false
  t.integer :genre_id, :allow_null => false
  t.string :url, :limit => 255, :allow_null => false
  t.string :title, :limit => 60, :allow_null => false
  t.text :summary, :limit => 350, :allow_null => false
  t.integer :votes_count, :default => 0
  t.datetime :published_at, :default => nil
  t.timestamps
end

All the fields that are "NOT NULL" are validated in the model first, so I'm wondering if I need to bother having allow_null in the migration? I'm not sure what benefits "NOT NULL" gives to the database, if any.

+9  A: 

Not much if you mean in terms of performance or storage efficiency. However, it's just good practice to push as many of your low-level constraints into the database layer. For one thing, it guarantees that a subtle bug in Rails isn't going to lead to some randomly NULL data in a not-null field. Likewise, if you ever run another app against the same database, it will be extremely helpful to have the constraints in a central place for maintenance and to avoid duplication.

Daniel Spiewak
+1  A: 

NOT NULL is one more thing where the computer can keep an eye on you and keep you from making mistakes.

Andy Lester
+1  A: 

This doesn't seemt o affect mySQL, but you should be aware of 2 recently fixed migration issues (one when you don't specify default)

http://blog.codefront.net/2008/05/04/living-on-the-edge-of-rails-19-change_table-for-migrations-and-more/

http://antoniocangiano.com/2008/07/14/a-close-look-at-three-rails-21-bugs/

Gene T