Is declaring an attribute of a table as UNIQUE equivalent to declaring it as PRIMARY KEY?
thanks a lot!
Is declaring an attribute of a table as UNIQUE equivalent to declaring it as PRIMARY KEY?
thanks a lot!
The different is: Primary key will create clustered index by default and only one PK can be existed in one table. Primary key can cover multiple columns (composite key)
No both are not same but are similar, when a column is Unique it has unique values but it also permit one Null value in that column but Primary does not permit any null values. Primary Key can be used for reference in some other table.
You can have only one Primary key in a table but multiple Unique Key
When you declare a UNIQUE constraint, SQL Server creates a UNIQUE index to speed up the process of searching for duplicates. In this case the index defaults to NONCLUSTERED index, because you can have only one CLUSTERED index per table.
Contrary to PRIMARY key UNIQUE constraints can accept NULL but just once. If the constraint is defined in a combination of fields, then every field can accept NULL and can have some values on them, as long as the combination values is unique.
Happy Coding !!!
Nope. Making a column as unique is very different from making it a primary key or part of primary key.
Nope.
PRIMARY KEYs must be UNIQUE, but UNIQUE keys need not be primary. You can have multiple UNIQUE keys in a table.
The key difference is that PRIMARY keys can not have NULL values, as they must uniquely identify a row. UNIQUE keys may be NULL, and multiple NULL values are permitted (unless you're using an uncommon table engine like BDB).
UNIQUE can still be NULL.
PRIMARY KEY means UNIQUE and NOT NULL and there can be only one PRIMARY KEY per table.