views:

601

answers:

5

I need to do a bunch of word replacements in a file and want to do it with a vi command, not an EX command such as :%s///g. I know that this is the typical way one replaces the word at the current cursor position: cw<text><esc> but is there a way to do this with the contents of the unnamed register as the replacement text and without overwriting the register?

+10  A: 

I'm thinking by "paste" you mean the unnamed (yank/put/change/delete/substitute) register, right? (Since that's the one that'd get overwritten by the change command.)

Registers are generally specified by typing " then the name (single character) of the register, like "ay then "ap to yank into register a, then put the contents of register a. Same goes for a change command. In this case, if you don't want the text you remove with the change command to go anywhere, you can use the black hole register "_: "_cw". Then once in insert mode, you can hit ctrl-R followed by the register you want (probably ") to put in the contents of that register.

  • "* - selection register (middle-button paste)
  • "+ - clipboard register (probably also accessible with ctrl-shift-v via the terminal)
  • "" - vim's default (unnamed) yank/put/change/delete/substitute register.

Short answer: "_cw^R"

Edit: as others are suggesting, you can of course use a different register for the yank (or whatever) that got your text into the default register. You don't always think of that first, though, so it's nice to do a single change command without blowing it away. Though it's not totally blown away. There are the numbered registers "0 through "9:

Vim fills these registers with text from yank and delete commands.

Numbered register 0 contains the text from the most recent yank command, unless the command specified another register with ["x].

Numbered register 1 contains the text deleted by the most recent delete or change command, unless the command specified another register or the text is less than one line (the small delete register is used then). An exception is made for the delete operator with these movement commands: %, (, ), `, /, ?, n, N, { and }. Register "1 is always used then (this is Vi compatible). The "- register is used as well if the delete is within a line.

With each successive deletion or change, Vim shifts the previous contents of register 1 into register 2, 2 into 3, and so forth, losing the previous contents of register 9.

Jefromi
P.S. Thanks for asking this question - I never got to talk about the black hole register before.
Jefromi
+1 I didn't know about the black hole register before, nice!
Daniel Vandersluis
All right, think I've copied enough of the docs on registers into my answer yet? It's all there under `:help registers`.
Jefromi
+1  A: 

If you make use of a named register (ie. use "ay or "ad, etc., to fill your paste register), you can do something like

cw<CTRL-R>a<esc>

Which will replace the word with the contents of register a. As far as I can tell, you can't use the default register because when you cw it'll be filled with the word that was cut by that command.

Daniel Vandersluis
You can use the default register! Check out my answer.
Jefromi
A: 

You can use registers for that:

first place replacement text in register <mark some text>"ay

where a is register name

then you can use that register in replacement

ve"ap

lollinus
Unfortunately, I couldn't simply repeat the last, paste operation via `.`, which is another thing I wanted to do. Thanks, though. Much appreciated.
plong
A: 

Do you mean the system paste buffer or the vi register?

If you want to use the system paste buffer then you are fine and could do dw"+P - " chooses a register, and "+ is the system paste buffer.

Otherwise copy into the non-default register with say "ay to copy into register a and then to replace something do dw"aP

Hamish Downer
Thanks, Hamish. I tried that, but `dw` deletes trailing whitespace after what I would consider the "word," whereas `cw` only changes the word. For that reason, `dw` won't work for me.
plong
In that case `de` should work for you - it will delete to the end of this word, while `dw` will delete to the start of the next word.
Hamish Downer
+1  A: 

You can use the visual mode of vim for this. e.g. copy a word: ye and then overwrite another one with the copied word: vep

Ste