Seems like rel-license only applies to pages not to specific elements... anyone spotted usage for page elements in the wild?
views:
140answers:
3
+1
A:
Have a look here and see if this is along the lines of what you're needing...
thismat
2008-10-29 20:28:53
+1
A:
The fact that rel-license
doesn't cover specific elements is a known bug.
The following is specifically marked as an open issue on the master list of rel-license
issues:
2006-04-07 raised by Evan:
It's not clear how to associate a license with part of a page, such as an image or embedded object in the page, or a single news entry on a news page. A typical use-case would be a Flickr page, for which the image is licensed under a CC license but the page itself is not.
Anirvan
2008-11-12 23:00:39
A:
I've never personally run into a situation that required this yet, but would be inclined to do something like this:
<p id="someparagraph">Lorum ipsum dolor sit amet.</p>
<div about="#someparagraph">
<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" rel="license">cc by 2.0</a>
</div>
Scott
2009-02-24 18:20:02