Is getchar() equivalent to scanf("%c",&a);?
Is putchar(c) equivalent to printf("%c",a); where a is a char variable?
+1
A:
Generally speaking yes they are the same.
But they are not in a few nitpicky ways. The function getchar is typed to int and not char. This is done so that getchar can both all possible char values and additionally error codes.
So while the following happily compiles in most compilers you are essentially truncating away an error message
char c = getchar();
The function scanf though allows you to use a char type directly and separates out the error code into the return value.
JaredPar
2010-03-20 10:33:21
Not error messages (as in, plural), "only" EOF. But otherwise, this is correct. It should also be said that getchar() is much more efficient than scanf(), because the library doesn't have to parse the format string (and the linker doesn't have to link in the large block of code that is scanf()).
DevSolar
2010-09-26 12:36:11
A:
They do the same thing here. However, if you know you are just doing characters then getchar and putchar will be more efficient, since the printf variants will have to parse the strung each time to determine how to process your request. Plus, they may be called in a lower level library meaning you may not have to have the printf/scanf linked if they are not needed elsewhere.
AlBlue
2010-03-20 10:34:35