views:

280

answers:

3

On a recent question about MVC attributes, someone asked whether using HttpPost and HttpDelete attributes on an action method would result in either request type being allowed or no requests being allowed (since it can't be both a Post and a Delete at the same time). I noticed that ActionMethodSelectorAttribute, from which HttpPostAttribute and HttpDeleteAttribute both derive is decorated with

[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Method,
                AllowMultiple = false,
                Inherited = true)]

I had expected it to not allow both HttpPost and HttpDelete on the same method because of this, but the compiler doesn't complain. My limited testing tells me that the attribute usage on the base class is simply ignored. AllowMultiple seemingly only disallows two of the same attribute from being applied to a method/class and doesn't seem to consider whether those attributes derive from the same class which is configured to not allow multiples. Moreover, the attribute usage on the base class doesn't even preclude your from changing the attribute usage on a derived class. That being the case, what's the point of even setting the values on the base attribute class? Is it just advisory or am I missing something fundamental in how they work?

FYI - it turns out that using both basically precludes that method from ever being considered. The attributes are evaluated independently and one of them will always indicate that the method is not valid for the request since it can't simultaneously be both a Post and a Delete.

A: 

AllowMultiple allows/disallows that specific attribute being used more than once. It has no effect on whether other attributes can be combined with it.

So for example, if you have an ObfuscationAttribute that controls whether renaming of the method is enabled or disabled, you would not want users to be able to do this:

[Obfuscation("DisableRenaming")]
[Obfuscation("EnableRenaming")]
void MyMethod()
{
}

In this case Obfuscation cannot be both enabled and disabled, so you'd use AllowMultiple=false to ensure that the method is only marked once with this particular attribute.

What you could hypothetically do, in your mutually-exclusive case, is use a single attribute called HttpSettings, which took a paraneter indicating whether it applied to the Post or Delete "mode". This could then be AllowMultiple=false to enforce the mutual exclusivity of the options.

Jason Williams
Your explanation is already part of the question. The proposal requires ownership of the code. The base question is about inheritance.
Henk Holterman
There's already an AcceptVerbsAttribute which does exactly what you describe. As @Henk indicates, I'm interested in is how the base class attribute usage comes into play, if at all.
tvanfosson
Ok, sorry - I misinterpreted your question.
Jason Williams
A: 

Let's make a short test:

using System;
using System.Text;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
using System.Reflection;

namespace TestAttrs {
    public abstract class BaseAttribute : Attribute { 
        public string text; 
    }

    [AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Method, AllowMultiple = true, Inherited = true)]
    public class MultipleInheritedAttribute : BaseAttribute {  }

    [AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Method, AllowMultiple = true, Inherited = false)]
    public class MultipleNonInheritedAttribute : BaseAttribute {  }

    [AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Method, AllowMultiple = false, Inherited = true)]
    public class SingleInheritedAttribute : BaseAttribute {  }

    [AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Method, AllowMultiple = false, Inherited = false)]
    public class SingleNonInheritedAttribute : BaseAttribute {  }

    public class BaseClass {
        [MultipleInherited(text = "MultipleInheritedBase")]
        [MultipleNonInherited(text = "MultipleNonInheritedBase")]
        [SingleInherited(text = "SingleInheritedBase")]
        [SingleNonInherited(text = "SingleNonInheritedBase")]
        public virtual void Method() { ; }
    }

    public class DerivedClass : BaseClass {
        [MultipleInherited(text = "MultipleInheritedDerived")]
        [MultipleNonInherited(text = "MultipleNonInheritedDerived")]
        [SingleInherited(text = "SingleInheritedDerived")]
        [SingleNonInherited(text = "SingleNonInheritedDerived")]
        public override void Method() {
            base.Method();
        }
    }

    [TestClass]
    public class AttributesTest {
        [TestMethod]
        public void TestAttributes() {
            MemberInfo mi = typeof(DerivedClass).GetMember("Method")[0];
            object[] attrs = mi.GetCustomAttributes(true);

            string log = "";
            foreach(BaseAttribute attr in attrs) {
                log += attr.text+"|";
            }
            Assert.AreEqual("MultipleInheritedDerived|SingleInheritedDerived|SingleNonInheritedDerived|MultipleNonInheritedDerived|MultipleInheritedBase|", log);
        }
    }
}

As you can see, if attribute is marked Inherted=true then it will be returned for derived classes, but if inherited method is marked with the same attribute - it will be supressed if AllowMultiple=false. So - in our test, log string contains both "MultipleInheritedDerived" and "MultipleInheritedBase", but not "SingleInheritedBase".

So answering your question - what's a point? This combination allows you to have a base controller with virtual method that you can override wihout worrying about attribute (it will be taken from base method), but at the same time to be able to override it if you want. HttpPostAttribute is not a good example, because it has no parameters, but other attributes can benefit from such settings.

Also, please note that code consuming attributes:

       object[] attrs = mi.GetCustomAttributes(true);

specifies that it is interested in inherited attributes. If write

       object[] attrs = mi.GetCustomAttributes(false);

then result would contain 4 attributes regardless of their usage settings. So it is possible for developer to ignore Inherited attribute usage setting.

Roman Eremin
My issue was not with how attributes are applied to methods, but why does the base attribute have an attribute usage that doesn't seem to matter. You can't actually apply an ActionMethodSelectorAttribute because it's abstract. You have to apply one of it's children. AllowMultiple=false on the abstract base attribute seems to make no difference because you can apply multiple child attributes of the base attribute as long as they are of different derived types. For your example to apply the attribute usage would need to be applied to BaseAttribute.
tvanfosson
@tvanfosson Now I finally see what do you mean. AllowMultiple specifies only instances of the same final attribute types, not its base class. For many usages it makes a perfect sense. In this particular case it is useless, but still will guide you if, for example you'll make your own non-abstract descendant from ActionMethodSelectorAttribute - something like [HttpMethod(HttpMethod.Post)]
Roman Eremin
+1  A: 

Setting AllowMultiple on a base attribute essentially sets a default for all attributes that derive from it. If you wanted all attributes deriving from a base atribute to allow multiple instances then you can save duplication by applying an [AttributeUsage] attribute to this effect to the base attribute avoiding the need to do the same to all the derived attributes.

For example, suppose you wanted to allow this:

public abstract class MyAttributeBase : Attribute
{
}

public sealed class FooAttribute : MyAttributeBase
{
}

public sealed class BarAttribute : MyAttributeBase
{
}

[Foo]
[Foo]
[Bar]
[Bar]
public class A
{
}

As it stands, this generates a compiler error since custom attributes, by default, do not permit multiple instances. Now, you could apply an [AttribteUsage] to both [Foo] and [Bar] like this:

[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class, AllowMultiple = true)]
public sealed class FooAttribute : MyAttributeBase
{
}

[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class, AllowMultiple = true)]
public sealed class BarAttribute : MyAttributeBase
{
}

But alternatively, you could instead just apply it to the base attribute:

[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class, AllowMultiple = true)]
public abstract class MyAttributeBase : Attribute
{
}

public sealed class FooAttribute : MyAttributeBase
{
}

public sealed class BarAttribute : MyAttributeBase
{
}

Both approaches have the same direct effect (multiple instances of both [Foo] and [Bar] are permitted) but the second approach also has the indirect effect that any other attributes deriving from [MyAttribute] will now allow multiple instances unless they have their own [AttributeUsage] that overrides that setting.

Daniel Renshaw
His issue is that allowing multiple of the same MyAttributeBase is allowed when AllowMultiple = false. So you'd only be allowed a single [Foo] OR [Bar].
Rangoric
There's no way to do that in .NET, as the questioner discovered and made clear in the question. I was addressing the question of "why would we ever apply AttributeUsage to a base attribute?"
Daniel Renshaw