I can imagine a poorly written contract which has requires a certification authority to timestamp data, but having a duly authorized corporate officer authenticate and digitally sign seems that it would be preferable on all counts. In particular, if I am suing you, it is simpler to depose your officer than some third-party CA.
If a third party CA is not a immutable contractual requirement, have the CA certify your officer's GPG or PGP free, home-made, always available signing key and timestamp in-house. It is actually better for everyone involved even if your customer mistakenly believes otherwise.
Added: A timestamp certification is only useful in legal proceeding or similar forensic endeavors (e.g. establishing patent priority). As such, they are only as credible as the person vouching for them. If your customer can't trust that your officer won't perjure herself over the authenticity of a time-stamp, they probably shouldn't be doing business with you. Or conversely, a notary only certifies that it was you who signed the document in his presence, he says nothing about the provenience or validity of the document, nor can he or should he.