I wrote the following code for a project that I'm working on:
var clicky_tracking = [
['related-searches', 'Related Searches'],
['related-stories', 'Related Stories'],
['more-videos', 'More Videos'],
['web-headlines', 'Publication']
];
for (var x = 0, length_x = clicky_tracking.length; x < length_x; x++) {
links = document.getElementById(clicky_tracking[x][0])
.getElementsByTagName('a');
for (var y = 0, length_y = links.length; y < length_y; y++) {
links[y].onclick = (function(name, url) {
return function() {
clicky.log(url, name, 'outbound');
};
}(clicky_tracking[x][1], links[y].href));
}
}
What I'm trying to do is:
- define a two-dimensional array, with each instance the inner arrays containing two elements: an
id
attribute value (e.g., "related-searches") and a corresponding description (e.g., "Related Searches"); - for each of the inner arrays, find the element in the
document
with the correspondingid
attribute, and then gather a collection of all<a>
elements (hyperlinks) within it; - loop through that collection and attach an
onclick
handler to each hyperlink, which should callclicky.log
, passing in as parameters the description that corresponds to theid
(e.g., "Related Searches" for theid
"related-searches") and the value of thehref
attribute for the<a>
element that was clicked.
Hopefully that wasn't thoroughly confusing! The code may be more self-explanatory than that.
I believe that what I've implemented here is a closure, but JSLint complains:
http://img.skitch.com/20100526-k1trfr6tpj64iamm8r4jf5rbru.png
So, my questions are:
- How can I refactor this code to make JSLint agreeable? Or, better yet, is there a best-practices way to do this that I'm missing, regardless of what JSLint thinks?
- Should I rely on event delegation instead? That is, attaching
onclick
event handlers to thedocument
elements with theid
attributes in my arrays, and then looking atevent.target
? I've done that once before and understand the theory, but I'm very hazy on the details, and would appreciate some guidance on what that would look like - assuming this is a viable approach.
Thanks very much for any help!