In the Oracle world, it's been gospel to build your database block size to be even multiples of the File system's block size. I assume this is still true but I'm not adverse to being told why technology has made this irrelevant.
But I've been told some SQL Server DBA's are going to upgrade the OS of a SS2000 installation to 64bit to get 64k pages in the FS.
Does SQL Server 2000 support changing the page size?
From what I've read it's fixed at 8k. Is that right?
If it is fixed at 8k, would there be any advantage to making the FS 64k?
I'm getting this information from a reliable source but none-the-less second hand.
EDIT: Thanks to SAMBO, I've read the links and found the specification for
"NTFS Allocation Unit Size" be set to 64Kb
I assume that term = Block Size...
So the conflict I have between 8k DB blocks and 64k FS blocks is in fact the recommended setup from MS.