Actually, the setup and tear-down is mentioned in the book "The Art of Unit Testing", which says that the attribute is called "[SetUp]" and not "[SetUpFixture]", which is not listed in the comparison table anyway.
So... for the "[SetUp]" attribute, the xUnit.net equivalent is just to use a constructor. The corresponding comment says:
'We believe that use of [SetUp] is generally bad. However, you can implement a parameterless constructor as a direct replacement. See Note 2. '
Further down, Note 2 says:
Note 2: The xUnit.net team feels that per-test setup and teardown creates difficult-to-follow and debug testing code, often causing unnecessary code to run before every single test is run.