views:

74

answers:

0

I like the way Guice makes it fairly straight forward to manually create your own modules each with their own bindings done in code. CDI on the other hand seems to rely more on magic rather than programmatic access to sest bindings. Am i wrong or how can one achieve the same effect with WELD.

Any code sample would be appreciated...

CLARIFICATION

I was hoping to build a Module(Guice term sorry im unsure of the CDI term) programmatically, using the builder pattern style as given by Guice on http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/.

I am building a dynamic system and there is a need for me to be able to bind types(like interfaces), constants etc rather than just have Weld dynamicaly scan the classpath etc and find and register types. I believe that CDI is static the javax.inject package does not include any interfaces that allow one to programmatically bind types to implementations.