In true object oriented systems, the type of the object is transparent to the client. So the code which handles books should not know what the type of the book is, but only invoke methods on books.
So if you need to implement different behaviour within the book in response to the method invocation, extend Book and override some of its methods. If you don't, then don't.
It appears, given the empty bodies of your subclasses, that they behave in every way the same as books. So you are merely tagging the book with some additional data - the difference between Encyclopaedia and Novel is no more essential to the book than hardback or softback or large print or standard print - a client may use these differently, and each book either is a large print book or it is a standard print book, but these are all attributes of the book rather than essential differences.
I wouldn't necessary use an enum for the book kind, since you may want to add more data - I'd either use a loose tagging system, so you can tag a book with a collection of kinds - so you would have a book tagged as { 'children's', 'ornithological', 'encyclopaedia', } - or allow structure in the roles - so there is a role for 'children's ornithological encyclopaedia' created when it is required, but no fixed enumeration.