Hi,
we are trying to build the Haskell-MaybeMonad sample from http://www.haskell.org/all_about_monads/html/maybemonad.html in F#.
The idea is to search for a mailaddress in two dictionaries. If one of the both lookups returns a result we look into the third one.
let bindM x k =
match x with
| Some value -> k value
| None -> None
let returnM x = Some x
type MaybeBuilder() =
member this.Bind(x, k) = bindM x k
member this.Return(x) = returnM x
member this.ReturnFrom(x) = x
member this.Delay(f) = f()
let maybe = MaybeBuilder()
//Sample dictionaries
let fullNamesDb =
[("Bill Gates", "[email protected]")
("Bill Clinton", "[email protected]")
("Michael Jackson", "[email protected]")
("No Pref Guy", "[email protected]")]
|> Map.ofList
let nickNamesDb =
[("billy", "[email protected]")
("slick willy", "[email protected]")
("jacko", "[email protected]") ]
|> Map.ofList
let prefsDb =
[("[email protected]", "HTML")
("[email protected]", "Plain")
("[email protected]", "HTML")]
|> Map.ofList
let mplus m1 m2 = if m1 <> None then m1 else m2
let (+) = mplus
let lookUp name = maybe {
let! combined = fullNamesDb.TryFind name + nickNamesDb.TryFind name
return! prefsDb.TryFind combined
}
let billGatesPref = lookUp "Bill Gates" |> printfn "%A" // Some "HTML"
let billyPref = lookUp "billy" |> printfn "%A" // Some "HTML"
let billClintonPref = lookUp "Bill Clinton" |> printfn "%A" // Some "Plain"
let steffenPref = lookUp "Steffen" |> printfn "%A" // None
let noPref = lookUp "No Pref Guy" |> printfn "%A" // None
System.Console.ReadKey() |> ignore
The problem is that we perform the second lookup even if the first one returns a result. The nice thing about Haskell is here, that it evaluates lazy. Now we looking for something similar in F#. We tried the following but it looks ugly and seems to break the idea of encapsulating the maybe logic in the builder:
let mplus m1 m2 = if m1 <> None then m1 else m2()
let (+) = mplus
let lookUp name = maybe {
let! combined = fullNamesDb.TryFind name + fun _ -> nickNamesDb.TryFind name
return! prefsDb.TryFind combined
}
Is there a better solution?
Regards, forki