If I wanted manage transactions programmatically, what is the difference between starting the transaction by injecting a PlatformTransactionManager vs directly injecting EntityMangerFactory/EntityManager and getting transaction from Entitymanager
public class MyDAO {
@PersistenceContext(unitName="test") EntityManager em;
JpaTransactionManager txnManager = null;
public void setTxnManager(JpaTransactionManager mgr) {
txnManager = mgr;
}
public void process(Request request) throws Exception {
TransactionStatus status =
txnManager.getTransaction(new DefaultTransactionDefinition());
try {
em.persist(request);
txnManager.commit(status);
} catch (Exception up) {
txnManager.rollback(status);
throw up;
}
}
As apposed to injecting EntityManager directly
public class MyDAO { @PersistenceContext(unitName="test") EntityManager em;
public void process(Request request) throws Exception {
EntityTransaction txn = em.getTransaction();
try {
em.persist(request);
txn.commit();
} catch (Exception up) {
txn.rollback();
throw up;
}
}
where as spring config snippet looks like this
<beans>
<bean id="MyDAO" class="com.xyz.app.dao.MyDAO">
<context:annotation-config />
<bean id="entityManagerFactory" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerE ntityManagerFactoryBean">
<property name="persistenceUnitName" value="persistence" />
<property name="dataSource" ref="dataSourceProvider" />
<property name="jpaVendorAdapter" ref="jpaVendorAdapter" />
</bean>
<bean id="transactionManagerJpa" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaTransactionM anager">
<property name="entityManagerFactory" ref="entityManagerFactory"/>
</bean>
</beans>